Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Rev. bras. cir. plást ; 30(1): 93-100, 2015. ilus, tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-883

ABSTRACT

INTRODUÇÃO A cirurgia plástica, apesar das diversas situações em que atua, tem o caráter estético difundido na sociedade, associado aos ideais de beleza e à busca das pessoas pela perfeição corporal. Atualmente, as medidas corporais são cada vez mais detalhadas, exibidas pela mídia como sucesso nos mais diversos âmbitos sociais. O objetivo do presente estudo será identificar o conceito de cirurgia plástica vinculado aos meios de comunicação impressos do Brasil e disponíveis virtualmente, analisando e descrevendo o tipo de informação veiculada ao público leigo. MÉTODO: Para a coleta de dados, foi realizada busca sistemática de todas as notícias publicadas em meios de comunicação impressos do Brasil e disponíveis virtualmente. Para a busca, utilizamos o descritor "cirurgia plástica" no Portal Interjornal®. Foram incluídas no estudo todas as notícias publicadas entre janeiro de 2008 e dezembro de 2011, que contêm o termo "cirurgia plástica". As notícias selecionadas foram lidas e submetidas a um protocolo previamente definido. RESULTADO: Foram analisadas 1983 notícias. Deste total, 1367 (68,94%) foram classificadas como estéticas; 423 (21,33%) como reparadoras; 47 (2,37%) como estéticas e reparadoras, e 146 (7,36%) como não classificáveis. CONCLUSÃO: O conceito da cirurgia plástica veiculado pela mídia está geralmente associado à realização de procedimentos estéticos. Tanto o conteúdo quanto a qualidade das informações disponibilizadas pela mídia são insuficientes para esclarecer o público de forma adequada sobre o verdadeiro papel da especialidade e os cuidados que devem ser tomados ao se submeter a qualquer tipo de procedimento cirúrgico.


INTRODUCTION Besides the diverse situations in which plastic surgery is performed, the procedure has an aesthetic character associated with societal issues, related to the ideals of beauty and to the search for body perfection. Currently, specific body measurements are increasingly being given importance, and shown by the media as being associated with success at diverse social levels. The objective of this study was to identify the concept of plastic surgery, as reported by the print media in Brazil and available in the virtual environment, by analyzing and describing the type of information that is reported to the general public. METHOD: For the data collection, a systematic search was performed on all news articles published by the print media in Brazil and available in the virtual environment. For the search, the descriptor used was "cirurgia plástica" ("plastic surgery" in English) in Portal Interjornal®. All news articles containing the term "plastic surgery" published between January 2008 and December 2011 were included in the study. The selected news articles were read and subjected to a previously established protocol. RESULTS: A total of 1983 news articles were analyzed. From this total, 1367 (68.94%) were classified as aesthetic related, 423 (21.33%) as being associated with reparative surgery, 47 (2.37%) as aesthetic and reparative, and 146 (7.36%) as undetermined. CONCLUSION: The concept of plastic surgery reported by the media was generally associated with aesthetic surgery. Both the content and the quality of information provided by the media are not enough to adequately clarify to the public the real role of the specialty and the care that should be taken when undergoing any type of surgical procedure.


Subject(s)
Humans , History, 21st Century , Surgery, Plastic , Brazil , Retrospective Studies , Journalism , Evaluation Study , Proof of Concept Study , Mass Media , Surgery, Plastic/statistics & numerical data , Journalism/standards , Journalism/ethics , Mass Media/standards , Mass Media/ethics
2.
Cir. & cir ; 77(5): 417-419, sept.-oct. 2009. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-566463

ABSTRACT

Actualmente existe gran inconsistencia en cómo los “desarrolladores de guías clínicas” en todo el mundo clasifican la calidad de la evidencia disponible y la fuerza de las recomendaciones, debido a que hay varios sistemas de clasificación. Por esa razón, los usuarios de las guías clínicas se enfrentan a retos profundos en la comprensión de guías clínicas. Importantes investigadores y gran número de ellos están adoptando el sistema GRADE para clasificar la calidad de la evidencia disponible y la fuerza de las recomendaciones cuando preparan manuscritos sobre guías clínicas. El sistema GRADE fue desarrollado por un grupo representativo de expertos en la elaboración de guías clínicas, muestra una clara separación entre el grado de evidencia y la fuerza de las recomendaciones, presenta una evaluación explícita sobre la importancia de los desenlaces finales de las diferentes estrategias de manejo, entre otras características. En esta breve revisión describimos las razones que explican la adopción de esta clasificación.


There is great inconsistency on how "Clinical Guideline Developers" worldwide rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations because there are several classification systems in use. Therefore, medical guideline users face profound challenges in understanding articles on Clinical Guidelines. Many researchers are adopting the GRADE system to classify the quality of the available evidence and the strength of recommendations when preparing a manuscript on Clinical Guidelines. The GRADE system has advantages over previous rating systems including being developed by a representative group of guideline developers, patent separation between quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, explicit evaluation of the importance of outcomes of alternative management strategies, and others. Consequently, in this brief review, we describe the reasons underlying the adoption of GRADE.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Journalism/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/classification , Publishing/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Periodicals as Topic/standards
3.
Campinas; Papirus; 11 ed; 2003. 59 p. ilus.
Monography in Portuguese | LILACS, EMS-Acervo | ID: lil-625884
4.
J Postgrad Med ; 2000 Jul-Sep; 46(3): 205-10
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-117122
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL